It’s been one week since the verdict in the George Zimmerman
trial was decided. J and I were out with friends to celebrate his birthday when
the verdict was announced. I was on my way to the restroom of a crowded venue
when I heard shouting and glanced up at a TV mounted on the ceiling to see
Zimmerman’s face and the word “acquitted.” I will admit that my first thought
was that there might be rioting, much like what occurred in L.A. after the
Rodney King case was announced in 1992. I hurried on to the restroom to be on the
safe side. Over the past week, I have read commentary and watched interviews
from both sides, seen long diatribes on Facebook outlining people’s reactions,
and discussed the case with family and friends.
This case has captivated many because it is so
multifaceted. Issues of race, age, character, and the rights of gun owners were thrust into the spotlight. As I followed this case in the aftermath of the verdict, it
struck me that one conversation that seems to be missing is our ability as human
beings to look at a situation from a perspective outside of our own life
experiences. As a nation, we have become less empathetic toward one
another in exchange for a false sense of security. When I think too long on
this, it distresses me to imagine the kind of society we are leaving for future
citizens of this country, including my own children.
As a mother, I feel compassion for any woman who has ever
lost her child, but especially for mothers who have lost children unexpectedly
and to violence. To have invested all of your love and energy to this life, and
then to have that life taken by another would be truly devastating.
I can never know what it feels like to be a young, black man
in the United States walking alone at night in a predominately white
neighborhood. But I do know what it’s like to be a woman walking alone at night
in a rough neighborhood. Gripping car keys between tensed fingers, always
anticipating what’s around the next corner, heart thumping in ears, the
constant urge to turn around and see what’s behind you. I grew up with cautionary tales of girls and women who had been overpowered, violated, or left
for dead. Every news story about sexual violence and every date rape episode of
Law & Order reminded us that the world could be a dangerous place to be
female. If I had grown up listening to the Rodney King story or felt like I was
under a cloud of suspicion every time I wore a hoodie, I might feel the need to
defend myself if someone approached me in the dark to ask me what I was doing.
I’ll never know for sure, but I can imagine it. That’s part of our humanity;
being able to imagine what an experience must be like for someone else.
I find it interesting that the characters of both Zimmerman
and Martin have been so thoroughly dissected by the general public. Neither man
would have been in the running for sainthood, but I know very few adults or
teenagers who are perfect. Their characters, beyond what happened the night of
the run-in, seem irrelevant to me. As a former high school teacher, I once
taught a first hour English class in which I am fairly certain ¾ of the
students were high each morning. These were low-to-middle income white and
Native American students from a rural area. While I don’t condone the use of
illicit drugs, marijuana is not associated with increased aggression, so unless
we are trying to prove that Martin was doing something that many of his
adolescent peers try at one time or another, I really don’t think we have
proven much.
Zimmerman had lawfully applied for and obtained a firearm,
and according to the laws of his state, had the legal right to carry it and
defend himself. Feeling threatened, Zimmerman produced his firearm and shot.
There’s a reason that when individuals enter into careers in law enforcement, they
are required to have extensive training in conflict resolution, mediation, and acceptable
situations in which to discharge a firearm under extreme emotional stress. As
far as I’m aware, there are no such demands put on individuals who are applying
for permits to carry. As a citizen of this country, I’m not comfortable with
the idea that the average layperson has the skills necessary to make decisions
under extreme emotional stress whose consequences have such potentially grave
outcomes. That certainly seemed to be the case in this situation, as it was
later discovered that Martin was unarmed.
While many will disagree, it’s my assertion that this is the
failure of a society, which in its attempts to feel secure in a post-9/11 era,
has created a monster by loosening gun control policies. Like an overzealous
parent, intent on protecting their offspring, we have created a nation that is
anxious, suspicious, and quick to react. Benjamin Franklin once said, “Those
who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety,
deserve neither liberty nor safety.” (Like the liberty to allow your
17-year-old to walk to the Quick Shop for a snack without getting shot.)
If I leave out matters of race, personal character, and gun
control, this case boils down to one thing for me: Trayvon Martin was not an
angel, but he was an unarmed, 17-year-old kid. I’m gonna go out on a limb here
and predict that there aren’t many of us (myself included) who can say that we always thought
clearly or made good decisions at 17. George Zimmerman was a
28-year-old man who had undertaken the responsibility of owning a potentially lethal
weapon. That kind of responsibility should dictate that when a 911 dispatcher
tells you to get back into your car and go home, that the police are on their
way, and there is no imminent bodily threat, you do it. You don’t get out of
your car and follow the person of concern on a misguided vigilante mission. If
Zimmerman had acted with the kind of maturity I expect from someone allowed to
carry a loaded weapon, Trayvon Martin would be alive today.
It’s important to me that J and I raise R and K to be the
kind of people who have empathy for others. When they’ve hurt someone, we ask,
“How would you feel if…?” We try to teach them to look at situations from
many perspectives before making rash judgments, even if those perspectives are
outside of their personal experiences. We ask, “What would it be like to…?” I wonder what the world would be like if more adults asked
themselves these same questions.
No comments:
Post a Comment